-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Backport src: fix handle leaks #7711 #9014
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MylesBorins
added
v4.x
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
labels
Oct 10, 2016
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
v4.x
labels
Oct 10, 2016
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
v4.x-staging
branch
from
October 10, 2016 22:18
6a126fb
to
004d665
Compare
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
backport-7711
branch
from
October 11, 2016 02:38
5f5eb12
to
10008ea
Compare
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2016
Not sure what is up with the CI. It's saying some tests failed but when you click through, everything is green. |
LGTM |
single failure is expected (freebsd) |
Fix handle leaks in Buffer::New() and Buffer::Copy() by creating the handle scope before looking up the env with Environment::GetCurrent(). Environment::GetCurrent() calls v8::Isolate::GetCurrentContext(), which creates a handle in the current scope, i.e., the scope created by the caller of Buffer::New() or Buffer::Copy(). PR-URL: nodejs#7711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle, otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller. PR-URL: nodejs#7711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Create a handle scope before performing a check that creates a handle, otherwise the handle is leaked into the handle scope of the caller. PR-URL: nodejs#7711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
API function callbacks run inside an implicit HandleScope. We don't need to explicitly create one and in fact introduce some unnecessary overhead when we do. PR-URL: nodejs#7711 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
backport-7711
branch
from
October 11, 2016 18:59
10008ea
to
6f3ac5d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a backport of #7711 to v4.x-staging
@bnoordhuis would you be able to review? The only conflict was in 5f5eb12, specifically around removing HandleScopes.
AFAIK I got everything right, but don't want to risk it.