-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: clarify fs.link and fs.linkSync arguments #9145
doc: clarify fs.link and fs.linkSync arguments #9145
Conversation
Nit: Do we want to rename them in the code as well? The functions are pretty short so it shouldn't be too difficult/risky. |
The individual parameter names below the function signature need to be updated as well. Slightly offtopic nit: we should use camel casing ( |
c133999
to
83c7a88
Compare
ab688c7
to
4bbf3ca
Compare
|
I've also "Allow[ed] edits from maintainers." here on GitHub. |
Anybody have an opinion on this?: Do we want to rename them in the code as well? The functions are pretty short so it shouldn't be too difficult/risky. I think we mostly have the parameter names listed in the docs matching the parameters in the code... |
I like these new names, it does seem more clear. If we change the docs I guess it would be inconsistent not to change the code to match. I can't see how changing the names would affect any code using these functions, so it should be straightforward to change. Is there any possibility of parameter name change causing breakage? |
[Common System Errors]: errors.html#errors_common_system_errors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the change in this line?
My editor probably added a new line to the end of the file that wasn't there before. I can remove to clean up the patch.
|
Clarifies documentation by replacing the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` with more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath`, reflecting how POSIX describes `link()`.
4bbf3ca
to
5618ae2
Compare
|
Updates the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` to match the more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath` in the documentation.
@Trott I pushed an additional commit changing argument names in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Clarifies documentation by replacing the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` with more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath`, reflecting how POSIX describes `link()`. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Updates the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` to match the more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath` in the documentation. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Clarifies documentation by replacing the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` with more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath`, reflecting how POSIX describes `link()`. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Updates the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` to match the more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath` in the documentation. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
should this be backported? feel free to update the labels |
Clarifies documentation by replacing the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` with more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath`, reflecting how POSIX describes `link()`. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Updates the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` to match the more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath` in the documentation. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Clarifies documentation by replacing the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` with more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath`, reflecting how POSIX describes `link()`. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Updates the argument names `srcpath` and `dstpath` to match the more descriptive `existingPath` and `newPath` in the documentation. PR-URL: #9145 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
fs and doc
(Edited this answer 2016-10-19T20:46+0000 to show commits patch both fs and fs doc.)
Description of change
Clarifies documentation by replacing the
fs.link
andfs.linkSync
argument namessrcpath
anddstpath
with more descriptiveexistingpath
andnewpath
, reflecting how POSIX describeslink()
.A few double-takes on my part inspired this small PR. As you're creating a new hard link, the "destination" seems like the new path, until it's actually done, when the "destination" of the new link seems like the prior-existing path.
The Linux manpage currently linked from doc names these arguments
oldpath
andnewpath
. A FreeBSD manpage I found online saysname1
andname2
. POSIX' listing calls thempath1
andpath2
. Since there's no hope of matching the manpage on every system, I went with the most descriptive names I could come up with, alluding to the POSIX explanatory text.