Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(learn): small update #6132

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 24, 2023
Merged

chore(learn): small update #6132

merged 10 commits into from
Nov 24, 2023

Conversation

AugustinMauroy
Copy link
Member

@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy commented Nov 21, 2023

Description

small modification on learn section to make it fairer and more up-to-date. I test all code

  • use node: for internal modules.
  • note for experimental feat.

Validation

  • All code provided example should work.
  • no grammar error.

Related Issues

No related issues

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run npx turbo lint to ensure the code follows the style guide. And run npx turbo lint:fix to fix the style errors if necessary.
  • I have run npx turbo format to ensure the code follows the style guide.
  • I have run npx turbo test to check if all tests are passing.
  • NA I've covered new added functionality with unit tests if necessary.

@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2023 10:54
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 21, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 24, 2023 1:35pm

Copy link
Member

@ovflowd ovflowd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Nice addition! Thank you, Augustin!

@AugustinMauroy
Copy link
Member Author

AugustinMauroy commented Nov 21, 2023

Just one things to do before merge, just verify grammar. yep I'm dysorthographic
I've already done it myself with the word corrector

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 100 🟢 97 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 95 🟠 83 🟢 92 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 99 🟢 96 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/download 🟢 100 🟢 97 🟢 92 🟢 92 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 100 🟢 97 🟠 83 🟢 92 🔗

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 87%
82.91% (398/480) 70.16% (87/124) 69.14% (65/94)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
71 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 5.569s ⏱️

Copy link
Collaborator

@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall I appreciate the attention to detail to improve the docs - thanks @AugustinMauroy

a couple of suggestions applied

AugustinMauroy and others added 2 commits November 24, 2023 09:42
…from-nodejs.md

Co-authored-by: Brian Muenzenmeyer <brian.muenzenmeyer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Augustin Mauroy <augustin.mauroy@outlook.fr>
…odejs.md

Co-authored-by: Brian Muenzenmeyer <brian.muenzenmeyer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Augustin Mauroy <augustin.mauroy@outlook.fr>
…d-line.md

Signed-off-by: Brian Muenzenmeyer <brian.muenzenmeyer@gmail.com>
@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Nov 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Nov 24, 2023
@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 24, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit cf5f25f Nov 24, 2023
15 checks passed
@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer deleted the chore(learn)-small-update branch November 24, 2023 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants