Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[PR] Let examples to have their own e2e tests #126

Closed
kopf-archiver bot opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

[PR] Let examples to have their own e2e tests #126

kopf-archiver bot opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
archive automation CI/CD: testing, linting, releasing automatically documentation Documentation improvements

Comments

@kopf-archiver
Copy link

kopf-archiver bot commented Aug 18, 2020 •
edited
Loading

A pull request by nolar at 2019-07-02 09:20:54+00:00
Original URL: zalando-incubator/kopf#126
Merged by nolar at 2019-07-03 17:51:34+00:00

Issue : #13

Let Kopf examples to have their own individual tests, not the generic all-purpose tests

This is needed for future PRs with pykube-ng and arbitrary resources handled: they will have their own assertions, not always related to the "KopfExample" CRD.

Types of Changes

  • Configuration change
  • Refactor/improvements
@kopf-archiver kopf-archiver bot closed this as completed Aug 18, 2020
@kopf-archiver kopf-archiver bot changed the title [archival placeholder] [PR] Let examples to have their own e2e tests Aug 19, 2020
@kopf-archiver kopf-archiver bot added automation CI/CD: testing, linting, releasing automatically documentation Documentation improvements labels Aug 19, 2020
@kopf-archiver kopf-archiver bot mentioned this issue Aug 19, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
archive automation CI/CD: testing, linting, releasing automatically documentation Documentation improvements
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
0 participants