-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for Signing scheme #175
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn <gokarnm@amazon.com>
Signing scheme was previously discussed #147 , in Signature spec. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lots of interesting ideas here.
A few nits, and the discussion to remove .default
from the x.509 scheme as default would be a configuration option.
signing-scheme.md
Outdated
*Q:* What is the relationship of Signing Scheme with Signature Envelope format? | ||
*A:* Signing Scheme aims to be agnostic of the Signature Envelope format. A given signing scheme can be implemented through any signature envelope format (such as JWS or COSE) as long as it can support the required signature schema used by the signing scheme. | ||
|
||
*Q:* Why trust store for Signing Authority (`x509/signingAuthority`) is distinct from trust store for Certificate Authority (`x509/ca`), why can’t they share the same trust store? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/Why trust store for Signing Authority
r/Why is the trust store used for the signing authority
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gokarnm, I'm not seeing the change here.
Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn <gokarnm@amazon.com>
Added line breaks on sentences in signing-scheme.md, will format other docs as a separate PR, and addressed some of review feedback from @SteveLasker . Still to rename signing scheme values and address feedback from Roy about auditability. |
Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn <gokarnm@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn <gokarnm@amazon.com>
cc: @roywill @SteveLasker for review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn <gokarnm@amazon.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn <gokarnm@amazon.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
signingAuthority
trust store.Signed-off-by: Milind Gokarn gokarnm@amazon.com
cc: @shizhMSFT @roywill @SteveLasker @sajayantony @priteshbandi @rgnote for review