Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2022. It is now read-only.

Remove legal cruft and clarify registry.npmjs.org is default #10532

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kemitchell
Copy link
Contributor

This small pull request:

  1. Follows on from Refer to npm terms of use on npmjs.com in LICENSE #10326 by deleting extraneous and potentially confusing legal-sounding language from README
  2. Further clarifies that registry.npmjs.org is the default package registry

@isaacs
Copy link
Contributor

isaacs commented Nov 23, 2015

LGTM.

We should land this on both master and v2 branches (and v1 branch?)

Also, cc @ashleygwilliams so we can ensure that this gets into the cli docs on the website.

@othiym23
Copy link
Contributor

and v1 branch?

My plan was for npm@1.4.29 to be the last release of npm@1, with subsequent versions of the Node 0.10 maintenance branch getting npm@2. I don't think it's necessary to land these changes there, unless we want to do another release of npm@1.4 specifically for the purposes of licensing.

@othiym23
Copy link
Contributor

I'm going to merge these into the npm@3 and npm@2 release branches for this week, which means that the license will be up-to-date as of npm@3.5.1 and npm@2.14.13.

@kemitchell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, @othiym23!

othiym23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2015
othiym23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2015
othiym23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2015
@othiym23
Copy link
Contributor

Landed as 743af42 and 21418ca on release-3.5.1, scheduled to be released to npm@next on Wednesday.

Landed as 6733539 and 1f3e936 on release-2.14.13, also scheduled to be released to npm@next-2 on Wednesday.

To bring all of the release lines into sync, 9538c2c, ec50079, and eadd752 have been cherry-picked onto the 1.4.x branch. This branch is not currently scheduled to (ever) receive another release, but if there's sufficient interest or concern from Node.js LTS (paging @jasnell), especially if Node.js 0.10 LTS hasn't gone out yet, it would be easy enough for me to produce an npm@1.4.30 that includes them. Otherwise, I'd like to stick to the plan of moving Node 0.10 over to npm@2, as planned in nodejs/Release#37.

@jasnell
Copy link

jasnell commented Nov 24, 2015

+1 thanks!
On Nov 23, 2015 5:58 PM, "Forrest L Norvell" notifications@github.com
wrote:

Landed as 743af42
743af42
and 21418ca
21418ca
on release-3.5.1, scheduled to be released to npm@next on Wednesday.

Landed as 6733539
6733539
and 1f3e936
1f3e936
on release-2.14.13, also scheduled to be released to npm@next-2 on
Wednesday.

To bring all of the release lines into sync, 9538c2c
9538c2c,
ec50079
ec50079,
and eadd752
eadd752
have been cherry-picked onto the 1.4.x branch. This branch is not
currently scheduled to (ever) receive another release, but if there's
sufficient interest or concern from Node.js LTS (paging @jasnell
https://github.com/jasnell), especially if Node.js 0.10 LTS hasn't gone
out yet, it would be easy enough for me to produce an npm@1.4.30 that
includes them. Otherwise, I'd like to stick to the plan of moving Node 0.10
over to npm@2, as planned in nodejs/Release#37
https://github.com/nodejs/LTS/issue%20s/37.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#10532 (comment).

othiym23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2015
othiym23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2015
@othiym23 othiym23 added this to the next milestone Nov 25, 2015
@othiym23
Copy link
Contributor

Getting ready to release npm@3.5.1 and npm@2.14.13, so closing this out!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants