Open RFC Meeting - Wednesday, August 19, 2020, 2:00 PM EST

[darcyclarke]

Why?

In our ongoing efforts to better listen to & collaborate with the community, we've started an Open RFC call that helps to move conversations & initiatives forward.

When?

Wednesday, August 19, 2020, 2:00 PM EST

Cadence:
This meeting is scheduled to take place bi-weekly. Previous meeting agendas and notes can be found here

Add to your Calendar:
You follow this & find other npm events by using our public events calendar

• gCal: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=npmjs.com_oonluqt8oftrt0vmgrfbg6q6go%40group.calendar.google.com
• iCal: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/npmjs.com_oonluqt8oftrt0vmgrfbg6q6go%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics

What?

All discussions surrounding RFCs are covered by the npm Code of Conduct. Please keep conversations constructive, civil & be mindful of when others are speaking. As is tradition, "raise your hand" when requesting to comment on a topic or request to comment asynchronously within the chat. The npm team may, at its own discretion, moderate, mute &/or remove a person from an Open RFC call for any reason.

Agenda

1. Housekeeping
   1. Introduction(s)
   2. Code of Conduct Acknowledgement
   3. Outline Intentions & Desired Outcomes
   4. Announcements
2. PR: #129 RFC: overrides - @isaacs
3. PR: #126 RFC: Adding types information to the Package JSON in the registry - @orta
4. PR: #1674 Rfc 0027 npm audit app id - @doddi
5. PR: #1586 [Feature] Security Pipeline - @jskoll
6. Issue: #190 [RRFC] npm run-series && npm run-parallel - @MylesBorins
7. PR: #185 RFC: Add ability to skip script hooks - @lumaxis
8. PR: #183 RFC21: bring back subset of npm_package_* environs - @isaacs
9. PR: #182 RFC: npm audit licenses - @bnb
10. PR: #165 RFC for parent package.json - @Christian24

How?

Join Zoom Meeting
https://npm.zoom.us/j/584504445

Dial by your location
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)

Meeting ID: 584 504 445
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abR8OFljr8

Watch the livestream
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK71Wk0I45SLTSXQA23GdIw/videos

Invitees

Please use the following emoji reactions to indicate your availability.

• 👍 - Attending
• 👎 - Not attending
• 😕 - Not sure

[doddi]

👍

…

On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 15:46, Darcy Clarke ***@***.***> wrote: Why? In our ongoing efforts to better listen to & collaborate with the community, we've started an Open RFC call that helps to move conversations & initiatives forward. When? Wednesday, August 19, 2020, 2:00 PM EST *Cadence:* This meeting is scheduled to take place *bi-weekly*. Previous meeting agendas and notes can be found here <https://github.com/npm/rfcs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+sort%3Aupdated-desc+is%3Aclosed+label%3Ameeting> *Add to your Calendar:* You follow this & find other *npm* events by using our *public events calendar* - gCal: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=npmjs.com_oonluqt8oftrt0vmgrfbg6q6go%40group.calendar.google.com - iCal: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/npmjs.com_oonluqt8oftrt0vmgrfbg6q6go%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics What? All discussions surrounding RFCs are covered by the npm Code of Conduct <https://www.npmjs.com/policies/conduct>. Please keep conversations constructive, civil & be mindful of when others are speaking. As is tradition, "raise your hand" when requesting to comment on a topic or request to comment asynchronously within the chat. The npm team may, at its own discretion, moderate, mute &/or remove a person from an Open RFC call for any reason. Agenda 1. *Housekeeping* 1. Introduction(s) 2. Code of Conduct Acknowledgement 3. Outline Intentions & Desired Outcomes 4. Announcements 2. *PR*: #1674 Rfc 0027 npm audit app id <npm/cli#1674> - @doddi <https://github.com/doddi> 3. *PR*: #1586 [Feature] Security Pipeline <npm/cli#1586> - @jskoll <https://github.com/jskoll> 4. *Issue*: #190 [RRFC] npm run-series && npm run-parallel <#190> - @MylesBorins <https://github.com/MylesBorins> 5. *PR*: #185 RFC: Add ability to skip script hooks <#185> - @lumaxis <https://github.com/lumaxis> 6. *PR*: #183 RFC21: bring back subset of npm_package_* environs <#183> - @isaacs <https://github.com/isaacs> 7. *PR*: #182 RFC: npm audit licenses <#182> - @bnb <https://github.com/bnb> 8. *PR*: #165 RFC for parent package.json <#165> - @Christian24 <https://github.com/Christian24> 9. *PR*: #129 RFC: overrides <#129> - @isaacs <https://github.com/isaacs> 10. *PR*: #126 RFC: Adding types information to the Package JSON in the registry <#126> - @orta <https://github.com/orta> 11. *PR*: #18 npm audit and audit-resolve.json <#18> - @naugtur <https://github.com/naugtur> How? *Join Zoom Meeting* https://npm.zoom.us/j/584504445 *Dial by your location* +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) *Meeting ID:* 584 504 445 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abR8OFljr8 *Watch the livestream* https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK71Wk0I45SLTSXQA23GdIw/videos Invitees Please use the following emoji reactions to indicate your availability. - 👍 - Attending - 👎 - Not attending - 😕 - Not sure — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#207>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB7VH5XBWL5RYFIZJDPGN3SBKH5HANCNFSM4QDS2MSA> .

[ruyadorno]

video record: https://youtu.be/r-tUXJT40zU
meeting notes: https://github.com/npm/rfcs/blob/fe5d0014f89b43832eda6cfc00644b06c5ccffd1/meetings/2020-08-19.md

[wesleytodd]

Sorry, zoom really needs a low data mode where I can just do audio only. Good conversations, my only addition to the "is platform support needed" on the parent package.json RFC is that I think the scope of tooling like Mikeal (and I think Snowpack is similar) is different. I think those experiments are great, but they require some larger buy in. The hope for this RCF in my opinion is that it helps enable what folks are doing today to be done more easily.

Anyway, hope you all have a good week, see you next call.

[doddi]

Updated RFC 0027 (npm audit metadata) to reflect meeting discussion #138

…

On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 21:21, Wes Todd ***@***.***> wrote: Sorry, zoom really needs a low data mode where I can just do audio only. Good conversations, my only addition to the "is platform support needed" on the parent package.json RFC is that I think the scope of tooling like Mikeal (and I think Snowpack is similar) is different. I think those experiments are great, but they require some larger buy in. The hope for this RCF in my opinion is that it helps enable what folks are doing today to be done more easily. Anyway, hope you all have a good week, see you next call. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#207 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB7VH5D2FOL2RRLBLPPVEDSBQX37ANCNFSM4QDS2MSA> .