Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

samples: cellular: at_client: disable legacy shim #18864

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

maxd-nordic
Copy link
Contributor

AT Client does not respond with the legacy shim enabled. We need to disable it.

AT Client does not respond with the legacy shim enabled.
We need to disable it.

Signed-off-by: Maximilian Deubel <maximilian.deubel@nordicsemi.no>
@maxd-nordic maxd-nordic requested review from a team as code owners November 13, 2024 15:00
@maxd-nordic maxd-nordic added the backport v2.8-branch auto-create a PR with same commits to v2.8-branch label Nov 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Nov 13, 2024
@maxd-nordic maxd-nordic added the bugfix Fixes a known bug label Nov 13, 2024
@maxd-nordic maxd-nordic assigned jtguggedal and unassigned jtguggedal Nov 13, 2024
@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Nov 13, 2024

CI Information

To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above
Build number: 1

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: 179b7fca119fd7d7e5706042be306cb2a47f855d

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: 179b7fca119fd7d7e5706042be306cb2a47f855d
merge base: 94d417ff5225397267df4d4b43868d31223e5ed1
target head (main): 83118d7d268baf9fb13c5260023fcd9b6e3aa4b6
Diff

Github labels

Enabled Name Description
ci-disabled Disable the ci execution
ci-all-test Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
ci-force-downstream Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
ci-run-twister Force run twister
ci-run-zephyr-twister Force run zephyr twister
List of changed files detected by CI (1)
samples
│  ├── cellular
│  │  ├── at_client
│  │  │  │ prj.conf

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: f51bdba1d9
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:f51bdba1d9_912848a074

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

  • ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
  • ✅ Build twister
    • sdk-nrf test count: 218
  • ✅ Integration tests
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
Disabled integration tests
    • desktop52_verification
    • doc-internal
    • test_ble_nrf_config
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_nrf_provisioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
    • test-low-level
    • test-sdk-audio
    • test-sdk-dfu
    • test-sdk-find-my
    • test-sdk-mcuboot
    • test-sdk-pmic-samples
    • test-sdk-sidewalk
    • test-sdk-wifi

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

@rlubos rlubos merged commit 6985c36 into nrfconnect:main Nov 13, 2024
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport v2.8-branch auto-create a PR with same commits to v2.8-branch bugfix Fixes a known bug changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants