-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A lot of changes #397
A lot of changes #397
Conversation
* parallelization working * updating tests * styling * updating test * added info about parallelization
* added prior sampling * updating news * deleting submission file * fixing the prior sampling * styling * added unit test for SMC starting from prior * added test for sample_prior * updating test after merging with TBB * styling * updating news
* fixing item name issue * updating a unit test * styling
* added handling of vector data #361 * styling
* updated set_priors function * closes #370
* updated set_priors function * closes #370 * fixed forgotten implementation
* incremented dev version * got rid of unused variable * turned new_data into a list * main part ready and passing tests * styling and fixing docs issue * Updating docs * small steps * adding user ids * added the consistency vector to the particles * updating examples * updating more * updating examples * passing rcmdchck * added deprecation notice for old burnin setting * skipping the deprecation notice * removed unnecessary brackets * updated particle handling * removed unused code * refactoring complete * ready for sequential updating * we have a loop * small fix * added learning examples * added test * added tests * styling and updating docs * updated expected test output * have to get rid of a test for now due to platform dependence
* added burnin * made iteration number a class member * simplified alpha update * got rid of rho_index * added alpha acceptance rate and test * preparing for rho_acceptance * added rho burnin * added tracking of acceptance * updating docs and examples * styling
The Linter error is a false positive. It reports on the
|
Alright, but then perhaps we should add those lines to linter.yml so CI doesn't bothers us about it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good job, interesting solution with the burnin()
function!
Absolutely. I'll add that now. |
@wleoncio I think I managed to fix the linter issue, but do you know where CodeFactor gets its settings from? |
Unfortunately, that's still a mystery to me 😅 |
No description provided.