[Access] Upgrade lru cache v2

[nozim]

Revised version of older PR (#4605) synced from latest master.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 83.33% and project coverage change: -0.49% ⚠️

Comparison is base (58a36d0) 55.64% compared to head (6324e09) 55.15%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4700      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.64%   55.15%   -0.49%     
==========================================
  Files         932      898      -34     
  Lines       86370    80612    -5758     
==========================================
- Hits        48059    44462    -3597     
+ Misses      34675    32966    -1709     
+ Partials     3636     3184     -452     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	55.15% <83.33%> (-0.49%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
engine/access/rpc/backend/backend_scripts.go	66.23% <0.00%> (+0.56%)	⬆️
engine/access/rpc/backend/backend_transactions.go	51.06% <ø> (-2.96%)	⬇️
module/trace/trace.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
engine/access/rpc/backend/backend.go	72.30% <50.00%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
engine/consensus/approvals/approvals_lru_cache.go	49.18% <50.00%> (-0.82%)	⬇️
engine/access/rpc/connection/cache.go	95.55% <100.00%> (ø)
engine/access/rpc/connection/node_mock.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
fvm/storage/derived/derived_chain_data.go	90.47% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 44 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nozim]

@peterargue @jordanschalm @durkmurder kindly help to rerun the ci. 🙏

[nozim]

@kc1116 kindly help to rerun the ci. Updated from latest master.

[nozim]

@peterargue @kc1116 thanks for approval. Will have to wait for updates in master to ensure the tests pass. I will ask you to merge afterwards 🙏

[peterargue]

@nozim looks like TestExecutionEvictingCacheClients is the test that failed, and is also affected by these changes. Have you looked into why it's failing?

[nozim]

@peterargue yes checking :)

[nozim]

@peterargue @kc1116 fixed failing test. Kindly re run the ci.