[EVM] Direct call hash calculation

[sideninja]

Closes: #5370

This PR changes how direct call calculation is done. It now relies on the implementation of hash calculation from the geth Transaction.
This was changed because the direct call hash was included in the block as transaction hashes, which meant that any client would expect to be able to fetch that transaction and then recalculate the same hash, but since the direct call had a custom hash calculation the transaction calculated hash would differ.

[sideninja]

@ramtinms one question I have about the implementation that I'm not sure how to address. We now have hash calculated out of a certain subset of direct call data, which means there might be multiple direct calls that produce the same hash actually since direct calls are not using nonces that might have been true even before. What if you make two direct call deposits with the same amount, and address etc, I believe they would produce the same hash. I don't believe this change introduces this problem, but it makes it maybe a bit worse even, since now we don't have the subtype included which means multiple subtype calls could even have the same hash.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 11 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (8b2113a) 55.96% compared to head (48df683) 60.66%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
fvm/evm/types/call.go	63.33%	11 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5369      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.96%   60.66%   +4.69%     
==========================================
  Files        1024      678     -346     
  Lines       99184    66805   -32379     
==========================================
- Hits        55512    40526   -14986     
+ Misses      39423    23132   -16291     
+ Partials     4249     3147    -1102     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	60.66% <79.24%> (+4.69%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.