feat: Reset the state on shutting down the flagd resolver (#410) #832
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
requested review from
beeme1mr,
Kavindu-Dodan,
thisthat and
toddbaert
providers/flagd/src/test/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdProviderTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/flagd/src/main/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdProvider.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
providers/flagd/src/main/java/dev/openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/FlagdProvider.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
mehtasankets
force-pushed
the
main
branch
4 times, most recently
from
8b31a9e
to
98b62b0
Compare
Kavindu-Dodan
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2024
…re#410) Signed-off-by: Sanket Mehta <mehtasankets@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reset the state on shutting down the flagd resolver
Adds feature #410
Notes
I've reset the state in corresponding resolvers instead of adding it in the provider. That way, resolvers can decide when and which state to reset to. Let me know if we should move this logic to provider instead.