ci: adding k8s-1.30

[JaydipGabani]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, using fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when the PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 48.03%. Comparing base (3350319) to head (5e03469).
Report is 105 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (3350319) and HEAD (5e03469). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (3350319)	HEAD (5e03469)
unittests	2	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3447      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   54.49%   48.03%   -6.46%     
==========================================
  Files         134      219      +85     
  Lines       12329    14844    +2515     
==========================================
+ Hits         6719     7131     +412     
- Misses       5116     6906    +1790     
- Partials      494      807     +313     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	48.03% <ø> (-6.46%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[maxsmythe]

should we be getting rid of this field?

[JaydipGabani]

matrix.GATEKEEPER_NAMESPCE does not exists in the workflow. Nor the variable GATEKEEPER_NAMESPACE is being used in make docker-buildx-crds rule.

[maxsmythe]

got it, thanks

[JaydipGabani]

While we are at it, do we want to remove testing on 1.26 and update to latest minor versions on 1.27, 1.28 & 1.29?

[maxsmythe]

I think updating the K8s versions tested would be wise.

[ritazh]

LGTM

[sozercan]

we can drop 1.26, it's eol

[sozercan]

same here