Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(metrics): ostream exporter should print out resource attributes #1523
fix(metrics): ostream exporter should print out resource attributes #1523
Changes from all commits
6a518dc
1eec14e
79124bb
361c13f
ade6377
a56d235
af0ee1f
05489f8
672354b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsarden - Looks like this part of the code is causing problem. As it's unordered_map, the order of printing of resource elements is implementation specific (so different in Windows and Linux). Can we ensure to print them in the given order - maybe move resource data to std::map first and then print, and then also ensure that the same order is used for comparison in unit-test? Or else do some smart comparison for resource data in unit-test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsarden - Just wondering if you have a plan to fix CI as mentioned above? Else, I can do it on top of your repo if you are fine :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing it. CI looks good now :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the ping and reproducing the error on a windows box!