-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Metrics SDK] Move Metrics Exemplar processing behind feature flag #1710
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1710 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 86.31% 86.32% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 169 169
Lines 5154 5146 -8
==========================================
- Hits 4448 4442 -6
+ Misses 706 704 -2
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved, see minor typo.
@@ -192,6 +192,8 @@ option(WITH_EXAMPLES "Whether to build examples" ON) | |||
option(WITH_METRICS_PREVIEW "Whether to build metrics preview" OFF) | |||
option(WITH_LOGS_PREVIEW "Whether to build logs preview" OFF) | |||
option(WITH_ASYNC_EXPORT_PREVIEW "Whether enable async export" OFF) | |||
option(WITH_METRICS_EXEMPLAR_PREVIEW | |||
"Whethere to enable exemplar within metrics" OFF) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typo: Whether
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And mentioned the spec status is experimental, so user will be aware of that instead of considering it as implementation gap?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks for the PR :)
…ad-local-stack * commit '9acde87b08b225ce511fa8a20c6cba14f2921518': (36 commits) Prepare v1.7.0 release with Metrics API/SDK GA. (open-telemetry#1721) Fix: 1712 - Validate Instrument meta data (name, unit, description) (open-telemetry#1713) Document libthrift 0.12.0 doesn't work with Jaeger exporter (open-telemetry#1714) Fix:1674, Add Monotonic Property to Sum Aggregation, and unit tests for Up Down Counter (open-telemetry#1675) [Metrics SDK] Move Metrics Exemplar processing behind feature flag (open-telemetry#1710) [Metrics API/SDK] Change Meter API/SDK to return nostd::unique_ptr for Sync Instruments (open-telemetry#1707) [Metrics] Switch to explicit 64 bit integers (open-telemetry#1686) Add metrics e2e test to asan & tsan CI (open-telemetry#1670) Add otlp-grpc example bazel (open-telemetry#1708) [Metrics SDK] Add support for Pull Metric Reader (open-telemetry#1701) Fix debug log of OTLP HTTP exporter and ES log exporter (open-telemetry#1703) [SEMANTIC CONVENTIONS] Upgrade to version 1.14.0 (open-telemetry#1697) Fix a potential precision loss on integer in ReservoirCellIndexFor (open-telemetry#1696) fix Histogram crash (open-telemetry#1685) Fix:1676 Segfault when short export period is used for metrics (open-telemetry#1682) Add timeout support to MeterContext::ForceFlush (open-telemetry#1673) Add CMake OTELCPP_MAINTAINER_MODE (open-telemetry#1650) [DOCS] - Minor updates to OStream Metrics exporter documentation (open-telemetry#1679) Fix:open-telemetry#1575 API Documentation for Metrics SDK and API (open-telemetry#1678) Fixes open-telemetry#249 (open-telemetry#1677) ...
Exemplar are still experimental, so exemplar processing is moved behind feature flag macro -
ENABLE_METRICS_EXEMPLAR_PREVIEW
. The exemplar would be processed in hot path only if the flag is enabled. The flag needs to be explicitly enabled in build script to use exemplars.This allows us
The CI tests still continue to test the full metrics functionality with feature flag enabled for both cmake and bazel.