Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Http client add url support #833
Http client add url support #833
Changes from 1 commit
379204e
3ccc3bf
d4a13cb
b68a259
481d4b4
281e257
2a8b9a8
e137175
9d28920
f11c94d
fe2c73e
0ea406e
357f879
6ecbebf
9257924
2be9bd5
365e18d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I see what you are doing. But I am not sure - maybe we should just deprecate the old method? I think this new one is much better. If we look at Javascript API for the
open
method, it only requires the URL parameter. In Java - this is also completely outsourced tojava.net.URL
. It's even more logical to assume that the session itself accepts URL object or string, rather than trying to implement multi-parameter parsing from host, port. Because it's rather[ scheme, host, port, location ]
than simply[ host, port ]
pair. It'd be best we just collapse all of it into single string parameter, then parse it usingURL
class.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes exactly, I just overloaded the function because that is what the @lalitb (the original issue creator) said might have been good. If its alright I can just simply remove the old parameter and just leave the new one since its also consistent with the
GET
andPOST
commands. But that is definitely a decision for the maintainers so when they give their input we can see whats the best course of action. @lalitb @reyangThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it makes sense to remove the original method as @maxgolov suggested.