-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Logger.Enabled
SDK processing implementation to the specification
#5425
Milestone
Comments
MrAlias
added
pkg:SDK
Related to an SDK package
blocked:specification
Waiting on clarification of the OpenTelemetry specification before progress can be made
area:logs
Part of OpenTelemetry logs
labels
May 28, 2024
MrAlias
removed
the
blocked:specification
Waiting on clarification of the OpenTelemetry specification before progress can be made
label
Aug 22, 2024
MrAlias
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2024
…ced type (#5692) Closes #5425 Our current log `Processor` interface contains more functionality than the [OTel spec](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/specification/logs/sdk.md#logrecordprocessor-operations). The additional functionality allows processors to report back to the API if a Record should be constructed and emitted or not, which is quite helpful[^1][^2][^3][^4][^5]. This removes the `Enabled` method from the `Processor` type. It adds this functionality a new optional and experimental `FilterProcessor` interface type. The logger and provider are updated to check for this optional interface to be implemented with the configured processors and uses them to back the `Logger.Enabled` method, preserving existing functionality. By making this change: - The `Processor` interface is now compliant with the OTel spec and does not contain any additional unspecified behavior. - All `Processor` implementations are no longer required to implement an `Enabled` method. The default, when they do not implement this method, is to assume they are enabled. ### Benchmark ```terminal goos: linux goarch: amd64 pkg: go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8550U CPU @ 1.80GHz │ old.txt │ new7.txt │ │ sec/op │ sec/op vs base │ LoggerEnabled-8 133.30n ± 3% 32.36n ± 3% -75.72% (p=0.000 n=10) │ old.txt │ new7.txt │ │ B/op │ B/op vs base │ LoggerEnabled-8 0.000 ± 0% 0.000 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹ ¹ all samples are equal │ old.txt │ new7.txt │ │ allocs/op │ allocs/op vs base │ LoggerEnabled-8 0.000 ± 0% 0.000 ± 0% ~ (p=1.000 n=10) ¹ ¹ all samples are equal ``` This is a significant performance improvement due to the `Record` no longer being converted from the API version to the SDK version. [^1]: https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/processors/minsev [^2]: https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log#BatchProcessor.Enabled [^3]: https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/log#SimpleProcessor.Enabled [^4]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/blob/af75717ac4fb3ba13eaea83b88301723122060cf/bridges/otelslog/handler.go#L206-L211 [^5]: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go-contrib/blob/d0309ddd8c5714af1cd9dbe8b39b7e8f10485679/bridges/otelzap/core.go#L142-L146 --------- Co-authored-by: Robert Pająk <pellared@hotmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sam Xie <sam@samxie.me>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Our current SDK implementation for the
Logger
'sEnabled
method, and the related loggingProcessor
methods are not a part of the specification. Having this be unspecified is a blocker for our logging signal to go stable.Add our current implementation to the specification, or a similar approach and update our implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: