autoinstrumentation: install musl based autoinstrumentation in Python Docker image #3384
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xrmx
force-pushed
the
python-build-musl-autoinstrumentation
branch
from
3d1a0c0 to
caded11
Compare
xrmx
changed the title
swiatekm
approved these changes
Oct 23, 2024
jaronoff97
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
As discussed here this introduce in the python image autoinstrumentation built from a musl container.
This is a prerequisite to actually add support for an annotation to use the musl based instrumentation instead of the default glibc one: #3332
Link to tracking Issue(s):
Testing: image builds fine
Documentation: