Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename SpanContext to SpanReference. #1075
Rename SpanContext to SpanReference. #1075
Changes from 10 commits
809fb37
32d0d88
434fcde
674815d
8fcf58c
b411406
a5c2d6b
7c5a93c
e23cc28
1d1be11
9b267aa
3e894df
01f145b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since we only put
Span
inContext
, should we useSpan
for this and the next few files?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Oberon00 Perhaps this is appropriate for #1079?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this would more be a follow-up of #994. I suggested related changes right in this PR as it neatly highlights all usages, but I think you are right that this could be in a separate PR. I don't think it belongs into #1079 though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a suggestion:
E.g. in Dynatrace we could reference the span with just span+trace ID but require some routing info in the trace state to do so efficiently. Not sure if this is generally applicable enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely something that can be done in a another PR, specially because this was not even touched in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this one is more related to that PR, as the name change reflects a change in the understanding of that type. But I'm fine with doing this in a follow-up too (I already approved)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same, the lack of trace state is not related to this PR.