-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 894
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify that unknown fields must be ignored when receiving OTLP/JSON #2816
Merged
yurishkuro
merged 4 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
tigrannajaryan:feature/tigran/clairfy-json-unknown-fields
Sep 27, 2022
Merged
Clarify that unknown fields must be ignored when receiving OTLP/JSON #2816
yurishkuro
merged 4 commits into
open-telemetry:main
from
tigrannajaryan:feature/tigran/clairfy-json-unknown-fields
Sep 27, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tigrannajaryan
force-pushed
the
feature/tigran/clairfy-json-unknown-fields
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 22, 2022 13:39
3700398
to
62f2367
Compare
tigrannajaryan
changed the title
Feature/tigran/clairfy json unknown fields
Clarify that unknown fields must be ignored when receiving OTLP/JSON
Sep 22, 2022
reyang
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2022
@open-telemetry/specs-approvers please review. |
bogdandrutu
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2022
bogdandrutu
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2022
yurishkuro
reviewed
Sep 25, 2022
carlosalberto
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2022
Resolves open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#425 The proposed behavior is necessary for interoperability of senders and receivers when OTLP protocol evolves in an allowed way: by adding new fields to existing messages.
tigrannajaryan
force-pushed
the
feature/tigran/clairfy-json-unknown-fields
branch
from
September 26, 2022 17:15
f13982d
to
c23843b
Compare
yurishkuro
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2022
Let's keep this open for a bit more since I deleted a sentence (although it doesn't change the meaning in any way). |
bogdandrutu
reviewed
Sep 27, 2022
pichlermarc
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2022
MrAlias
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2022
bogdandrutu
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2022
tigrannajaryan
deleted the
feature/tigran/clairfy-json-unknown-fields
branch
September 27, 2022 17:19
This was referenced Oct 7, 2022
carlosalberto
pushed a commit
to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
…pen-telemetry#2816) * Clarify that unknown fields must be ignored when receiving OTLP/JSON Resolves open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#425 The proposed behavior is necessary for interoperability of senders and receivers when OTLP protocol evolves in an allowed way: by adding new fields to existing messages. * Remove unnecessary sentence * Fix typo Co-authored-by: Yuri Shkuro <yurishkuro@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves open-telemetry/opentelemetry-proto#425
The proposed behavior is necessary for interoperability of senders and receivers when OTLP protocol evolves in an allowed way: by adding new fields to existing messages.