Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

mapping with generic types may not generate nested classes #91

Closed
hauner opened this issue Dec 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

mapping with generic types may not generate nested classes #91

hauner opened this issue Dec 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@hauner
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Milestone
2023.6.1

Comments

@hauner
Copy link
Member

hauner commented Dec 17, 2023

having a mapping like this

map:
  types:
    - type: Values => java.util.Map<java.lang.String, {package-name}.model.Value>>

the processor does generate the Value class but does NOT generate the class of a nested object.
@hauner
Copy link
Member Author

hauner commented Dec 17, 2023

.. it should walk the Value object to mark any nested object as used .

@hauner hauner self-assigned this Dec 17, 2023
@hauner hauner added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 17, 2023
@hauner hauner added this to the 2023.6.1 milestone Dec 17, 2023
hauner added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2023
@hauner
add nested object (#91)
4a20642
hauner added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2023
@hauner
walk generic data type (#91)
2b1860e
hauner added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2023
@hauner
add nested object (#91)
b8ef7bd 
(cherry picked from commit 4a20642)
hauner added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2023
@hauner
walk generic data type (#91)
fee86c0 
(cherry picked from commit 2b1860e)
@hauner hauner closed this as completed Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hauner hauner

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2023.6.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hauner