refactor(go mod): migrate to go modules

[cndoit18]

During the migration process, some code is updated directly in the vendor folder, causing inconsistent with the upstream code repository.
I move this part of the code to the migrate
folder.

fixes #1355

Signed-off-by: cndoit18 cndoit18@outlook.com

[cndoit18]

In order to completely abolish the vendor, we also need some work to migrate the code from the migrate folder to the official version.

[cndoit18]

cc @shlomi-noach

[shlomi-noach]

Thank you! I can take a look into those changes. Appreciate the kick off!

[cndoit18]

Thank you! I can take a look into those changes. Appreciate the kick off!

Creating a vendor folder is to compatible downstream, if you need, you can delete it to test

I just used go mod vendor.

[cndoit18]

I will try to fix the repair, simply verify the test of CI.

[shlomi-noach]

thanks again - commit 3d33edf modifies the raft logic - I'd like to avoid that. If we switch to go modules then that's what we should be doing, without logic changes.
I have indeed updated the raft library inline, because my contribution upstream was not accepted. Alas, this is how it has to stay - upstream has diverged since then in a completely different direction, and I don't wish to try and sync with it again.

So I don't mind creating e.g. a openark/raft repo, and use a replace { ... } directive to point to that repo. Same for golib, if needed. What do you think?

[cndoit18]

thanks again - commit 3d33edf modifies the raft logic - I'd like to avoid that. If we switch to go modules then that's what we should be doing, without logic changes.
I have indeed updated the raft library inline, because my contribution upstream was not accepted. Alas, this is how it has to stay - upstream has diverged since then in a completely different direction, and I don't wish to try and sync with it again.

So I don't mind creating e.g. a openark/raft repo, and use a replace { ... } directive to point to that repo. Same for golib, if needed. What do you think?

This is too good.

[cndoit18]

dependency on openark/golib#10

[cndoit18]

We have successfully switched to go modules!
Next, we can add a cache. same like Dockerfile
And migrated to golang 1.16
It is very big, I think it should be divided into multiple PR.
WDYT @shlomi-noach

https://github.com/presslabs/mysql-operator/pull/681/files

[cndoit18]

Of course, we have to ensure that the upstream changes will not affect us after migrating to the go modules.

[shlomi-noach]

We have successfully switched to go modules!

How did you deal with the changes in raft library?

Next, we can add a cache. same like Dockerfile

Sorry, which cache is that? Do you mean a go mod proxy?

And migrated to golang 1.16

Sorry again, I'm confused. How do you mean?

[cndoit18]

We have successfully switched to go modules!

How did you deal with the changes in raft library?

Next, we can add a cache. same like Dockerfile

Sorry, which cache is that? Do you mean a go mod proxy?

And migrated to golang 1.16

Sorry again, I'm confused. How do you mean?

Sorry, please forgive me for bad English, so that there is no expression clear

I use https://github.com/openark/raft, you already have
Docker uses layers when building, if you first use go mod download, the follow-up to build images can be reused.
You are still using golang1.14 image, which can be upgraded to golang1.16.

[cndoit18]

https://petomalina.medium.com/using-go-mod-download-to-speed-up-golang-docker-builds-707591336888
You can see this

[shlomi-noach]

I use https://github.com/openark/raft, you already have

Can you believe that I completely forgot that I did?

Docker uses layers when building, if you first use go mod download, the follow-up to build images can be reused.

I understand now. Shall we do it in a separate PR?

You are still using golang1.14 image, which can be upgraded to golang1.16.

I understand. We can it now, right?

[cndoit18]

I use https://github.com/openark/raft, you already have

Can you believe that I completely forgot that I did?

Docker uses layers when building, if you first use go mod download, the follow-up to build images can be reused.

I understand now. Shall we do it in a separate PR?

You are still using golang1.14 image, which can be upgraded to golang1.16.

I understand. We can it now, right?

Yes, we do it in a separate PR

[cndoit18]

You are still using golang1.14 image, which can be upgraded to golang1.16.

I understand. We can it now, right?

Your code has used too many shell scripts. For me, it is very difficult

[shlomi-noach]

Your code has used too many shell scripts. For me, it is very difficult

No problem. I can do this in a different PR. I am grateful to you for this work.

[cndoit18]

Your code has used too many shell scripts. For me, it is very difficult

No problem. I can do this in a different PR. I am grateful to you for this work.

Thank you

[shlomi-noach]

I pushed some final changes to the branch: I ran go mod tidy && go mod vendor and committed the changes.

[cndoit18]

I pushed some final changes to the branch: I ran go mod tidy && go mod vendor and committed the changes.

cool

[cndoit18]

I pushed some final changes to the branch: I ran go mod tidy && go mod vendor and committed the changes.

squash commits into one.

[shlomi-noach]

I'm gonna review this in a few more days and hopefully merge by end of week.