Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: rework validation scripts #158

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 23, 2017
Merged

Conversation

cyphar
Copy link
Member

@cyphar cyphar commented Jul 23, 2017

It appears that local-validate has not been running in recent PRs. Fix
this by reworking make ci and the travis configuration to make sure it
runs. This is critical for CII bading.

In addition, this un-comments git-validation which has resolved their
issues with running in Travis.

Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai asarai@suse.de

Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
@cyphar cyphar force-pushed the rework-validation branch 9 times, most recently from cbcc821 to 00e1a81 Compare July 23, 2017 18:27
This is necessary in order to avoid go-vet warnings, as well as removing
the ugly Engine{engine} interface. In future, the implementation of
casext.Engine will be made private and casext.Engine will be an
interface.

Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
It appears that local-validate has not been running in recent PRs. Fix
this by reworking `make ci` and the travis configuration to make sure it
runs.

In addition, this un-comments git-validation which has resolved their
issues with running in Travis.

Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
@cyphar
Copy link
Member Author

cyphar commented Jul 23, 2017

LGTM.

@cyphar cyphar merged commit 0b4bec4 into opencontainers:master Jul 23, 2017
cyphar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2017
@cyphar cyphar deleted the rework-validation branch July 23, 2017 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant