Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: implement grading strategies for peer evaluations #2196
feat: implement grading strategies for peer evaluations #2196
Changes from all commits
85bf487
eb4b911
9b4d8e2
c3c73c2
a4fe366
cde0f5d
09e7b9f
d804bdb
fcc3c8b
3936e2d
9351c35
3a3f841
0cd23e1
a31f654
ced373a
a955bde
99a8bc1
4101928
f4da665
d323dc9
0d8975b
7c97379
b1df638
e507ab5
61f952c
9ba4f80
4c6f474
97ff348
da58dc8
69bc17a
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I got an unexpected mean score:
(it's the second default rubric, so poor=0, fair=1, good=3, excellent=5):
1 + 0 + 3 + 1 + 5 = 10, 10/5 =2
Is it because there's no
2
in the rubric, so it rounds up to the next one3
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This threw me for a loop. So, I tried replicating the same scenario. Here's the criteria I used:
Ideas: poor=0, fair=3, good=5
Content: poor=0, fair=1, good=3, excellent=5
Graded by 5 configuration
And got:
While researching, I found that the assessments are retrieved, ordered, and then truncated by the number of peer grades needed. Could you confirm that the number of peer grades configured while testing was 5?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also added an extra test here with the exact values: https://github.com/openedx/edx-ora2/pull/2196/files#diff-7fe9b2681acaf897f2dd62a13553badf288fd6144832ce0562c4a58bd2640e7fR2381
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also reproduced the same scenario with the graded-by-3 configurations and got 2 since the 1st three peers graded 1, 0, and 3 in that order. Please let me know if the submission order also affected your tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh wow, submission order does affect the final score! That's annoying.
Thanks for that -- I also ran this test with the numbers shuffled in a different order, to confirm that it's not the "mean score" logic that's causing this issue. It must be something done after that.
Yes, 5 peer grades were required, and only 5 were received.
I used the default graded-by-5 configuration, with
Ideas: poor=0, fair=3, good=5
Content: poor=0, fair=1, good=3, excellent=5
Audit user received the same "Content" peer assessments as Honor, but in a different order, and so they got different scores. (Apologies about the "Ideas" assessments, I thought I did them all the same too, but apparently not.)
Audit received:
Honor received: