Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

Cleanup Ellaism bootnodes #8276

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2018
Merged

Cleanup Ellaism bootnodes #8276

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2018

Conversation

ellaismer
Copy link
Contributor

Removed several bootnodes known not to be running anymore. Added two new ones.

Removed several bootnodes known not to be running anymore. Added two new ones.
@parity-cla-bot
Copy link

It looks like @ellaismer signed our Contributor License Agreement. 👍

Many thanks,

Parity Technologies CLA Bot

@5chdn 5chdn self-assigned this Apr 3, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn added A2-insubstantial 👶 Pull request requires no code review (e.g., a sub-repository hash update). M2-config 📂 Chain specifications and node configurations. labels Apr 3, 2018
@5chdn 5chdn added this to the 1.11 milestone Apr 3, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@5chdn 5chdn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the nodes are working for me. Are that actual peers or just some kind of boot node that seeds peers and disconnects?

@ellaismer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@5chdn That's weird. Most of those bootnodes are actual peers, and I'm able to use them to successfully sync the network. It might be that some peers are full so they reject new peers. And how did you test whether they're working?

@5chdn
Copy link
Contributor

5chdn commented Apr 3, 2018

$ parity --chain ./ellaism.json --reserved-peers ./ellaism.peer --reserved-only                                                                                                                               

with ellaism.json and where ellaism.peer contains the bootnodes

@5chdn
Copy link
Contributor

5chdn commented Apr 3, 2018

maybe you should increase the max-peers of the bootnodes?

@ellaismer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I checked bootnodes that I have control (the first three). None of them reached max-peers.

There're some nodes there I need to run an older Parity version (v1.6.10), would that be an issue?

@ellaismer
Copy link
Contributor Author

And I'm able to at least connect to 2 peers using the command you provided, with ellaism.json file as in this PR and ellaism.peer file set as the bootnodes.

 Syncing #1252020 d6e9…e917     0 blk/s    0 tx/s   0 Mgas/s    246+    0 Qed  #1252305    2/25 peers   79 KiB chain 7 KiB db 1 MiB queue 601 KiB sync  RPC:  0 conn,  0 req/s,   0 µs
 Syncing #1252909 6f7f…df26    88 blk/s  817 tx/s  22 Mgas/s      0+    0 Qed  #1252909    2/25 peers   2 MiB chain 361 KiB db 0 bytes queue 452 KiB sync  RPC:  0 conn,  0 req/s,   0 µs

Hmm just wonder what might be the problem..

@5chdn
Copy link
Contributor

5chdn commented Apr 3, 2018

It's working well if I drop the reserved-only option, so I'm fine with merging this.

@debris debris merged commit 99a13c4 into openethereum:master Apr 3, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A2-insubstantial 👶 Pull request requires no code review (e.g., a sub-repository hash update). M2-config 📂 Chain specifications and node configurations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants