This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Enable all Constantinople hard fork changes in constantinople_test.json #9505
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
32ab7d7
Enable all Constantinople hard fork changes in constantinople_test.json
sorpaas 522c9b9
Address grumbles
sorpaas c47df60
Remove EIP-210 activation
sorpaas ad7aa97
8m -> 5m
sorpaas 6216700
Temporarily add back eip210 transition so we can get test passed
sorpaas 5f0c7c3
Add eip210_test and remove eip210 transition from const_test
sorpaas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why 8_000_000? What about
to match eip 649, 1234?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think those json test are used in a all or nothing basis (eg from ethereum test), so putting the sum of eip 649 and 1234 together at 0 makes sense (on two line it would be better but I think json dont allow to identical keys). I got a doubt 649 was a 3 million delay and 1234 another additional 5 million ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fine by me. 649 is 3 million, 1234 is 2 million. sum is 5 million.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My mistake, when reading 1234, " 5 million blocks later than previously specified with the Homestead fork" gave me the wrong impression of additional 5M but it would have been only true if refering to byzantium fork.
So yes we need to use 5M instead of 8M for this line.