Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nested expand #32

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hylkevds
Copy link
Contributor

@hylkevds hylkevds commented Jan 9, 2017

This tests nested expands, with $top, $skip, $select and $count options for those nested expands.

Since the set of methods that can actually check results for this type of query can also fully check the simple test results for $expand, $top, $skip, $count and $select, I replaced the check for those as well in the last commit. This shortens Capability3Tests.java by a lot and no longer depends on odd string magic.

This continues on pull request #29

@dstenger dstenger added this to the 1.3 milestone Oct 24, 2022
@dstenger
Copy link
Contributor

There are many merge conflicts in this pull request.
@hylkevds Might you be able to solve those?

@hylkevds
Copy link
Contributor Author

That may take a while. Especially since I wrote this almost 6 years ago. By now I thin we're both equally familiar with the code ;)

@dstenger dstenger removed this from the 1.3 milestone Oct 26, 2022
@ghobona
Copy link
Contributor

ghobona commented Oct 31, 2022

Given that this Pull Request simply refactors some of the code and that the Pull Request is several years old, it has most likely been overtaken by events. I therefore propose that we close it without merging. This will avoid the risk of the refactoring breaking the ETS.

If there is no objection, I will close it on 2022-11-07.

@hylkevds
Copy link
Contributor Author

It does a lot more than just refactor code, as is clearly explained in the PR text.

@ghobona
Copy link
Contributor

ghobona commented Oct 31, 2022

@hylkevds Ok, understood. If you can help to resolve the code conflicts that would be appreciated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants