Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1068 replace terminology #1098

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022
Merged

1068 replace terminology #1098

merged 8 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022

Conversation

georgimld
Copy link
Collaborator

@georgimld georgimld commented Apr 11, 2022

Checklist

  • I have followed (at least) the PR section of the contributing guide.
  • I fixed all necessary PR warnings
  • The commit history is clean
  • The E2E tests are passing
  • If possible, the issue has been divided into more subtasks
  • I did a self review before requesting a review from another team member

Description

  • Replaced master & slave terminology with alpha and beta
  • Replaced the master branch name and image tag with main

Closes #1068

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 11, 2022

Warnings
⚠️ A new TODO was added.
⚠️

Make sure the Organization-Vault-Secret is the same in all .env_example files

⚠️

Make sure the Organization-Vault-Secret is the same in all .env_example files

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against b9fe1e6

@openkfwCI
Copy link

openkfwCI commented Apr 11, 2022

NotesTime
Note for Reviewer: E2E tests on remote server succeededTue, 19 Apr 2022 14:33:03 +0000

Generated by E2E-Test

@Stezido Stezido changed the base branch from new-2.0.0 to 2.0.0-release April 13, 2022 08:40
@georgimld georgimld force-pushed the 1068-replace-terminology branch 2 times, most recently from 0b88974 to ea38a92 Compare April 19, 2022 08:40
@mayrmartin mayrmartin merged commit 596a52a into 2.0.0-release Apr 20, 2022
@Stezido Stezido deleted the 1068-replace-terminology branch June 8, 2022 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants