-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds EPUB validation extension module based on W3C's EPUBCheck #460
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
496cfd9
Add EPUB external module
karenhanson a39334c
Move constants for all Portico modules into PorticoConstants
karenhanson f5cd4da
EPUB checkSignature modified to return valid=UNDETERMINED
karenhanson f412dbd
Fix Codacy issues, per pull request report
karenhanson 1d2d27b
Add empty corpora folder for EPUB-ptc
karenhanson 94e7af6
Use latest EPUBCheck - 4.2.2 now available
karenhanson a8db674
Adjust thread stack size of JVM
karenhanson ee698e5
Use List not Set at top level of properties tree for consistency in p…
karenhanson 809bb16
Add test to check UTF-8 encoding of EPUB title field
karenhanson 607f268
TEST - E-PUB module testing
carlwilson fc266ae
FIX - Integration test fixes
carlwilson fde5ea7
FIX - add E-PUB memory param to Travis build.
carlwilson 2cc25a1
DEBUG - added cat statement for Travis.
carlwilson cf85b91
FIX - send more stack memory.
carlwilson fbd6317
Remove separation of local and remote resource lists due to inconsist…
karenhanson 93d74b1
Clean up references to local/remote resources
karenhanson a163653
Merge branch 'integration' into epub-ext
carlwilson b905e37
Merge branch 'integration' into epub-ext
carlwilson e435183
Merge branch 'integration' into epub-ext
carlwilson 5199c32
Merge branch 'integration' into epub-ext
carlwilson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this is the additional argument for 32bit JVMs. I'm a little curious as to whether this would affect Travis builds as it appears that both of the JVMs on Travis are 64bit. Am also curious if the failure is determinate, i.e. it fails consistently without this arg.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The behavior was quite strange. It seemed that one Travis build or the other would fail but never both or none - I'm not sure if that was just a coincidence. They seemed consistent in their failure or success when I repeated the same Travis build. Running them on a small test Linux instance I had they were much less consistent - if I ran them a few times, eventually they would build. I wonder if using a 32-bit JVM simply increases the chance of failure, but the failure is not impossible in the 64-bit environment for some reason.