-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade Lucene to 9.8.0 #10276
Upgrade Lucene to 9.8.0 #10276
Conversation
753d4f1
to
e5b556f
Compare
Compatibility status:Checks if related components are compatible with change 65d73e0 Incompatible componentsSkipped componentsCompatible componentsCompatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git] |
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Hi, want to have a double check. This won't be backport to 2.x before 2.11 release, right? |
9.8.0 was officially released this morning: https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_8_0/changes/Changes.html Signed-off-by: Michael Froh <froh@amazon.com>
e5b556f
to
65d73e0
Compare
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
2 similar comments
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #10276 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 71.24% 71.17% -0.08%
+ Complexity 58260 58233 -27
============================================
Files 4830 4830
Lines 274575 274586 +11
Branches 40015 40020 +5
============================================
- Hits 195629 195436 -193
- Misses 62570 62759 +189
- Partials 16376 16391 +15
|
I don't know. For now, I'm just focused on applying the change to main. We can theoretically backport to 2.x before the start of the release window. |
+1 with backporting to 2.11. |
9.8.0 was officially released this morning: https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_8_0/changes/Changes.html Signed-off-by: Michael Froh <froh@amazon.com>
It’s cutting it a little short for 2.11 but it looks like the performance improvements are compelling. |
Is there a backport PR ready? What are the reasons other than “it’s a little short before a code freeze” not to take it? |
I could make one tomorrow morning (essentially bundling 2 PRs). |
I've had some folks approach me around the office about this with similar concerns to those voiced by @model-collapse in #8668:
Based on our "release window" model where we have two weeks to produce a working distribution build from tomorrow's code freeze and the fact that we nearly missed it for 2.10, I'm starting to appreciate the risk that we could end up "just not releasing" 2.11. (Frankly, it is a time of year when people at AWS are particularly concerned about missing releases.) |
Would it make sense to do a fast-follow 2.12 release with only Lucene 9.8? |
9.8.0 was officially released this morning: https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_8_0/changes/Changes.html Signed-off-by: Michael Froh <froh@amazon.com>
9.8.0 was officially released this morning: https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_8_0/changes/Changes.html Signed-off-by: Michael Froh <froh@amazon.com>
Hi @msfroh , do we have any plan on releasing a new version with this fix any time soon? |
@LiuCao0614 |
Cool thanks @reta . |
9.8.0 was officially released this morning: https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_8_0/changes/Changes.html Signed-off-by: Michael Froh <froh@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <hishiv@amazon.com>
Description
9.8.0 was officially released this morning:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_8_0/changes/Changes.html
Related Issues
N/A
Check List
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.