Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.x] Use provisioning thread pool in Process Node #379

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 7419e9f from #374.

(cherry picked from commit 7419e9f)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@dbwiddis dbwiddis force-pushed the backport/backport-374-to-2.x branch from 8ad805d to ee91ec6 Compare January 5, 2024 23:28
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (fe608ec) 72.30% compared to head (ee91ec6) 72.17%.

Files Patch % Lines
...rk/transport/ProvisionWorkflowTransportAction.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x     #379      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     72.30%   72.17%   -0.14%     
+ Complexity      578      577       -1     
============================================
  Files            72       72              
  Lines          2986     2986              
  Branches        231      232       +1     
============================================
- Hits           2159     2155       -4     
- Misses          723      728       +5     
+ Partials        104      103       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dbwiddis dbwiddis merged commit 57b09dd into 2.x Jan 5, 2024
11 of 15 checks passed
@dbwiddis dbwiddis deleted the backport/backport-374-to-2.x branch January 5, 2024 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant