Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] PPL has issues working with backticks in spark catalog namspaces #260

Closed
ps48 opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

[BUG] PPL has issues working with backticks in spark catalog namspaces #260

ps48 opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
0.3 bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ps48
Copy link
Member

ps48 commented Feb 23, 2024

What is the bug?

Doesn't Work:
PPL : source = `glue_1`.`default`.`http_logs` | head 10

Error: Fail to analyze query. Cause: spark_catalog requires a single-part namespace, but got [`glue_1`, `default`]

Works: 
PPL : source =  glue_1.default.http_logs | head 10

SQL: select * from `glue_1`.`default`.`http_logs` limit 10

SQL: select * from glue_1.default.http_logs` limit 10

What is the expected behavior?
The PPL and SQL behaviour should be consistent with the tags

Do you have any screenshots?

Screenshot 2024-02-23 at 10 45 04 AM
Screenshot 2024-02-23 at 10 45 38 AM
oblem.

@ps48 ps48 added bug Something isn't working untriaged labels Feb 23, 2024
@noCharger
Copy link
Collaborator

@ps48 this should have being fixed by #224, could you verify?

@ps48
Copy link
Member Author

ps48 commented Mar 1, 2024

@noCharger I'm not sure if that PR fixes this issue. This is particular to PPL implementation.

@dai-chen dai-chen added 0.3 and removed untriaged labels Mar 11, 2024
@dai-chen
Copy link
Collaborator

dai-chen commented Mar 11, 2024

This looks like in PPL implementation in Flint extension. @YANG-DB Could you have a quick look?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0.3 bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants