Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] DNM : Enable evented pleg feature to default #318

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sairameshv
Copy link
Member

This PR is to verify and to debug the issues if any present while running the e2e tests

cc: @harche @JoelSpeed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 7, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and tkashem June 7, 2023 00:49
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Downloading the must gather from the techpreview job, searching for bind: address already in use, there are 46 hits.

This is the same symptom we were seeing when debugging the MCO PR on Thursday. Looks like the various operators that are degraded are those that are affected from a quick scan.

I had search through existing CI failures but all of these AFAICT are having difficult binding to hostports, where the symptom here is difficulty binding to a port within the pod network namespace, which in theory should never happen

Feature gates decoded from the kubelet.conf for reference (98-master-generated-kubelet MachineConfig):

"featureGates": {
    "AdmissionWebhookMatchConditions": true,
    "AlibabaPlatform": true,
    "AzureWorkloadIdentity": true,
    "BuildCSIVolumes": true,
    "CSIDriverSharedResource": true,
    "DynamicResourceAllocation": true,
    "EventedPLEG": true,
    "ExternalCloudProviderAzure": true,
    "ExternalCloudProviderGCP": true,
    "GCPLabelsTags": true,
    "GatewayAPI": true,
    "InsightsConfigAPI": true,
    "MachineAPIProviderOpenStack": true,
    "MatchLabelKeysInPodTopologySpread": true,
    "MaxUnavailableStatefulSet": true,
    "NodeSwap": true,
    "OpenShiftPodSecurityAdmission": true,
    "PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": true,
    "PrivateHostedZoneAWS": true,
    "RetroactiveDefaultStorageClass": true,
    "SigstoreImageVerification": true
  },

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 14, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jun 15, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 30, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 30, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sairameshv
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mfojtik for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 5, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 10, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 15, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 15, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 23, 2023

@sairameshv: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview b76a43e link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-upgrade b76a43e link true /test e2e-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn b76a43e link true /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial b76a43e link true /test e2e-aws-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-techpreview b76a43e link true /test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 23, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

Issue has been identified and fixed upstream - kubernetes/kubernetes#120942

@sairameshv sairameshv closed this Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants