Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: updates lvmvolumegroupnodestatus for vg #110

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022
Merged

fix: updates lvmvolumegroupnodestatus for vg #110

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022

Conversation

nbalacha
Copy link
Contributor

@nbalacha nbalacha commented Feb 15, 2022

Fixes a bug where the lvmvolumegroupnodestatus was not updated correctly
for an existing VG. When adding a new device and restarting the
vg-manager pod, the device is added to the LVM VG but is not updated in
the lvmvolumegroupnodestatus or the LVMCluster status.

fixes: #105

Signed-off-by: N Balachandran nibalach@redhat.com

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2022
@nbalacha nbalacha requested review from sp98 and leelavg February 15, 2022 10:13
if vgStatus.Name == status.Name {
found = true
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • not toggling found may create a new vgstatus as per condition in line 331
  • so found should still be set to true 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that was removed by mistake. I will update the PR.

Fixes a bug where the lvmvolumegroupnodestatus was not updated correctly
for an existing VG. When adding a new device and restarting the
vg-manager pod, the device is added to the LVM VG but is not updated in
the lvmvolumegroupnodestatus or the LVMCluster status.

Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nibalach@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@leelavg leelavg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 15, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: leelavg, nbalacha

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 205028c into openshift:main Feb 15, 2022
@nbalacha nbalacha deleted the status-fix branch February 16, 2022 07:28
@nbalacha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.10

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@nbalacha: new pull request created: #112

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No news disks are added to the LVMCluster/LVMvolumegroupnodestatuses
4 participants