OCPBUGS-34227: feat: chunk size policy

[jakobmoellerdev]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[jakobmoellerdev]

/test all

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34227, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jakobmoellerdev

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jakobmoellerdev]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jakobmoellerdev]

/test all

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.36364% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.72%. Comparing base (a0a2217) to head (2dd9e9a).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #633       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   77.97%   60.72%   -17.26%     
===========================================
  Files          28       54       +26     
  Lines        2016     4448     +2432     
===========================================
+ Hits         1572     2701     +1129     
- Misses        335     1497     +1162     
- Partials      109      250      +141     

Files	Coverage Δ
api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_types.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
internal/controllers/vgmanager/controller.go	78.35% <100.00%> (+5.48%)	⬆️
internal/controllers/vgmanager/lvm/lvm.go	99.03% <100.00%> (ø)
api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_webhook.go	88.16% <96.15%> (+4.44%)	⬆️
...ternal/controllers/vgmanager/lvm/mocks/mock_lvm.go	35.86% <44.44%> (ø)

... and 27 files with indirect coverage changes

[openshift-ci]

@jakobmoellerdev: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[suleymanakbas91]

/lgtm

[jakobmoellerdev]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34227, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @radeore

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34227: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/lvm-operator#633

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34227 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jakobmoellerdev]

/cherry-pick release-4.16

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@jakobmoellerdev: #633 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.16":

Applying: feat: chunk size policy
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_types.go
M	api/v1alpha1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
M	bundle/manifests/lvm.topolvm.io_lvmclusters.yaml
M	catalog/lvms-operator/v0.0.1.yaml
M	config/crd/bases/lvm.topolvm.io_lvmclusters.yaml
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging config/crd/bases/lvm.topolvm.io_lvmclusters.yaml
Auto-merging catalog/lvms-operator/v0.0.1.yaml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in catalog/lvms-operator/v0.0.1.yaml
Auto-merging bundle/manifests/lvm.topolvm.io_lvmclusters.yaml
Auto-merging api/v1alpha1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
Auto-merging api/v1alpha1/lvmcluster_types.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 feat: chunk size policy
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.