Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kube 1.4 cherry picks #11709

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Nov 2, 2016
Merged

Conversation

ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

@ncdc ncdc commented Nov 1, 2016

xref #11642

I've added a drop commit to fix the e2es panicking. We'll see how it goes.

soltysh and others added 27 commits November 1, 2016 06:57
Add Timeout field to client-go Config object to keep e2e tests happy. This will
be replaced naturally during the rebase to 1.5.
@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncdc commented Nov 1, 2016

[test]

@ncdc ncdc mentioned this pull request Nov 1, 2016
@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncdc commented Nov 1, 2016

[test] #10228

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to b4597a4

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10956/) (Base Commit: 16306a6)

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10956/) (Base Commit: 16306a6)

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Nov 1, 2016

That additional commit LGTM.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 1, 2016

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pr_origin/10956/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_5300)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to b4597a4

@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 235ed24 into openshift:master Nov 2, 2016
@timothysc
Copy link

It looks like we dropped the etcd3 perf changes... so, I would pretty much never recommend to go clientv3 then.

/cc @mffiedler

@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncdc commented Nov 2, 2016

@timothysc dropped as in they used to be there and we accidentally removed them, or we didn't get around to pulling them in?

@timothysc
Copy link

@ncdc there was a question on the original issue #11642 about whether to pull them in, so it looks like an oversight.

@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncdc commented Nov 2, 2016

@smarterclayton do you want upstream 35205 in?

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Nov 2, 2016

Both of the doubtful PRs are:

  • 35205 - contains fixes to etcd3
  • 33699 - moves informer to client

and I decided not to include them by default due to possible complications at this point in time. I'm leaving that decision to @smarterclayton about both of them.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Pretty sure we need 35205 - is it a hard patch?

On Nov 2, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Maciej Szulik notifications@github.com wrote:

Both of the doubtful PRs are:

  • 35205 - contains fixes to etcd3
  • 33699 - moves informer to client

and I decided not to include them by default due to possible complications
at this point in time. I'm leaving that decision to @smarterclayton
https://github.com/smarterclayton about both of them.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#11709 (comment),
or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABG_pwh_obo3gsJhR4E6qNKtlULB2tjrks5q6OmTgaJpZM4KmaY8
.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Nov 3, 2016

Not sure if hard, but a big one. I'll give it a shot on my way to Brno.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants