Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: <drop>: fixup for 14537 #6409

Merged

Conversation

markturansky
Copy link
Member

Conflicts and rejected patch files means I missed a few things in the origin patch PR.

This PR cleans up a few issues and fixes one bug.

@deads2k @pweil-

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Dec 18, 2015

[test]

@markturansky
Copy link
Member Author

Unrelated flake?

Error from server: 501: All the given peers are not reachable (failed to propose on members [https://172.18.15.99:4001] twice [last error: Unexpected HTTP status code]) [0]
!!! Error in hack/../test/end-to-end/core.sh:164
    'oc delete pod cli-with-token-2' exited with status 1
Call stack:
    1: hack/../test/end-to-end/core.sh:164 main(...)
Exiting with status 1
Error from server: User "e2e-user" cannot list all buildconfigs in the cluster

@pweil-
Copy link
Contributor

pweil- commented Dec 18, 2015

re[test]

@markturansky
Copy link
Member Author

Different flake:

Error from server: User "system:anonymous" cannot list pods in project "default"
Dry run enabled - no modifications will be made. Add --confirm to remove images
!!! Error in hack/../test/cmd/../../hack/cmd_util.sh:407
    'return 1' exited with status 1
Call stack:
    1: hack/../test/cmd/../../hack/cmd_util.sh:407 os::cmd::try_until_success(...)
    2: hack/../test/cmd/newapp.sh:20 main(...)
Exiting with status 1
!!! Error in hack/test-cmd.sh:284
    '${test}' exited with status 1
Call stack:
    1: hack/test-cmd.sh:284 main(...)
Exiting with status 1
make: *** [test-int-plus] Error 1

@markturansky
Copy link
Member Author

[test]

@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

ncdc commented Dec 18, 2015

@markturansky FYI that wasn't the flake. The flake was #6259 (comment), which we're trying to fix with #6407

@markturansky
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the clarification.

@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

ncdc commented Dec 18, 2015

Latest failure:

Running hack/../test/cmd/builds.sh:79: executing 'oc patch bc/ruby-sample-build -p '{"spec":{"output":{"to":{"name":"different:tag1"}}}}'' expecting success...
FAILURE after 0.279s: hack/../test/cmd/builds.sh:79: executing 'oc patch bc/ruby-sample-build -p '{"spec":{"output":{"to":{"name":"different:tag1"}}}}'' expecting success: the command returned the wrong error code
There was no output from the command.
Standard error from the command:
Error from server: unable to find api field in struct BuildConfig for the json field "metadata"
!!! Error in hack/../test/cmd/../../hack/cmd_util.sh:193
    'return 1' exited with status 1
Call stack:
    1: hack/../test/cmd/../../hack/cmd_util.sh:193 os::cmd::expect_success(...)
    2: hack/../test/cmd/builds.sh:79 main(...)
Exiting with status 1
!!! Error in hack/test-cmd.sh:284
    '${test}' exited with status 1
Call stack:
    1: hack/test-cmd.sh:284 main(...)
Exiting with status 1
[FAIL] !!!!! Test Failed !!!!

[test]

@ncdc
Copy link
Contributor

ncdc commented Dec 18, 2015

❄️ ⛄

Error from server: 501: All the given peers are not reachable (failed to propose on members [https://172.18.3.40:4001] twice [last error: Unexpected HTTP status code]) [0]
!!! Error in hack/../test/end-to-end/core.sh:164
    'oc delete pod cli-with-token-2' exited with status 1
Call stack:
    1: hack/../test/end-to-end/core.sh:164 main(...)
Exiting with status 1

[FAIL] !!!!! Test Failed !!!!

[test]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to 078ce03

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin/7995/)

@markturansky
Copy link
Member Author

woot! all green!

@danmcp
Copy link

danmcp commented Dec 18, 2015

@ncdc I think you asked me about it earlier. It isn't tagged for merge though.

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Going to merge so it makes a build afterwards but I want to see a LGTM and sign off from the upstream reviewer. [merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_origin/7995/) (Image: devenv-rhel7_2994)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin merge up to 078ce03

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2015
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 4ed816a into openshift:master Dec 19, 2015
if err != nil {
newClaim, ok := newObj.(*api.PersistentVolumeClaim)
if !ok {
glog.Errorf("Expected PersistentVolumeClaim but handler received %+v", newObj)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this be a return? you go on to use newClaim anyway, which seems wrong

@miminar miminar mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants