Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Profile description is inconsistent #16

Closed
trickvi opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Profile description is inconsistent #16

trickvi opened this issue Jul 9, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@trickvi
Copy link
Contributor

trickvi commented Jul 9, 2015

It is unclear, except for from the examples how to structure the "profiles" top level attribute. Also the spec says it should be an array, but the example shows it as a hash. That's inconsistent. The open discussion on dataprotocols we're directed to does not have a suggested resolution.
@trickvi trickvi mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2015
Closed
@stevage
Copy link
Contributor

stevage commented Jul 23, 2015

I think the plan for profiles evolved a bit, see frictionlessdata/datapackage#87 (comment)

TL;DR: the doc is out of date, and it should be a hash, as in the example. (Well, I'm not sure what the "*" is supposed to represent).

stevage added a commit to stevage/osep that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2015
@stevage
Update profiles sentence in response to openspending#16
4933b2a
@rufuspollock
Copy link
Member

FIXED. INVALID. I actually think we won't require profiles stuff for the moment. May add it later but I'd want to think more about what value it delivers. Maybe it should be a SHOULD not a MUST etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@rufuspollock @stevage @trickvi