Add motivation for attribute vs. element #613
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
scottaohara
reviewed
Sep 30, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
here you go @mfreed7
lemme know if you think i could expand on anything further.
andrico1234
approved these changes
Oct 1, 2022
|
Approved! :) |
|
Thank you both! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There have been more questions lately about why we're implementing this via a content attribute, and not, e.g. a
<popup>element. For example, here. This adds a section that goes into more detail. I also updated some links and the TOC.@andrico1234 I could use help getting this landed soon, if possible. Thanks!
@scottaohara if you have time for a review, that'd be helpful!