Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework problem data (or the persistence hash). #2644

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

drgrice1
Copy link
Member

This makes it so that persistence hash is only saved to the database when answers are submitted. In the case that answers can be checked by the user (via the "Check Answers" button), then the persistence hash is saved JSON encoded in a hidden form field. That case does not need the security of saving to the database, and in that case it shouldn't be saved to the database because answers aren't being recorded and the data in that case should temporary. So a hidden form field is just right for this.

I objected to the previous implementation when #1940 was submitted, but allowed it at that time, but this is how the problem_data should have been implemented. Nothing should be written to the database for this when answers are not being recorded. If an instructor is acting as a student, the previous code was saving the persistent data to the student's problem even when the instructor just enters the problem. Of course it was also saving every time the instructor did anything with the problem including using the "Preview My Answers" button, the "Check Answers" button, the "Show Correct Answers" button, the "Show Problem Grader" button. Literally any form submission of the page. That just was not thought out.

The render_rpc (and html2xml) routes use the hidden form field approach to also support saving the problem data from the persistence hash. This means that problems that use the persistence hash can be tested in the PG problem editor.

Note that the PERSISTENCE_HASH_UPDATE flag is removed. That didn't improve efficiency at all. The processing that was done with that was too much. Even if this were saved when it was before it would have been more efficient to just save it.

The handling of the persistence hash is also reworked for PG in a corresponding pull request (see openwebwork/pg#1165). PG just sends the hash, and it can contain anything that can be JSON encoded. Webwork2 just JSON encodes it and stores it, but only when answers are submitted.

This makes it so that persistence hash is only saved to the database
when answers are submitted. In the case that answers can be checked by
the user (via the "Check Answers" button), then the persistence hash is
saved JSON encoded in a hidden form field.  That case does not need the
security of saving to the database, and in that case it shouldn't be
saved to the database because answers aren't being recorded and the data
in that case should temporary. So a hidden form field is just right for
this.

I objected to the previous implementation when openwebwork#1940 was submitted, but
allowed it at that time, but this is how the problem_data should have
been implemented. Nothing should be written to the database for this
when answers are not being recorded.  If an instructor is acting as a
student, the previous code was saving the persistent data to the
student's problem even when the instructor just enters the problem.  Of
course it was also saving every time the instructor did anything with
the problem including using the "Preview My Answers" button, the "Check
Answers" button, the "Show Correct Answers" button, the "Show Problem
Grader" button.  Literally any form submission of the page.  That just
was not thought out.

The render_rpc (and html2xml) routes use the hidden form field approach
to also support saving the problem data from the persistence hash. This
means that problems that use the persistence hash can be tested in the
PG problem editor.

Note that the PERSISTENCE_HASH_UPDATE flag is removed.  That didn't
improve efficiency at all.  The processing that was done with that was
too much.  Even if this were saved when it was before it would have been
more efficient to just save it.

The handling of the persistence hash is also reworked for PG in a
corresponding pull request. PG just sends the hash, and it can contain
anything that can be JSON encoded.  Webwork2 just JSON encodes it and
stores it, but only when answers are submitted.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant