Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2021. It is now read-only.

Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) #383

Merged

Conversation

davidfestal
Copy link
Contributor

@davidfestal davidfestal commented May 22, 2019

This PR is a followup of PR #280 that only focuses on the upstream-community-operators addition, as requested by comment #280 (comment)

This PR adds Eclipse Che operator to upstream community operators. Eclipse Che operator auto detects infra, so can run on vanilla k8s and OpenShift.

Tested on Minikube version v1.1.0 with the last master versions on the OLM + operator-marketplace.

image

image

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 22, 2019
@davidfestal davidfestal changed the title Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) [WIP] Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) May 22, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 22, 2019
Signed-off-by: David Festal <dfestal@redhat.com>
@davidfestal davidfestal changed the title [WIP] Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) May 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 27, 2019
Signed-off-by: David Festal <dfestal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Festal <dfestal@redhat.com>
@davidfestal
Copy link
Contributor Author

@robszumski @tkashem I removed the WIP flag on the PR, and it seems that the last build and checks were OK. Could you confirm if the PR is OK for merge now, or I would still have something to do before ?

@davidfestal davidfestal changed the title Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) [WIP] Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) May 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 27, 2019
@davidfestal davidfestal changed the title [WIP] Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) Add community Eclipse Che operator (for upstream operators) May 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 27, 2019
@dmesser dmesser merged commit 1783bca into operator-framework:master May 31, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants