Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.2 #211

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 7, 2023

Conversation

rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
while trying to figure out failing tests

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 1, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall LGTM to enable k8s 1.26 support.

A general nit: I think we should investigate the deprecation notices from the lint check to see if there is an alternative we can change and do a little bit of future proofing for our next k8s bumps.

Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rashmigottipati This doesn't seem to bump the scaffolding of the plugin. Would that be done as a follow up?

go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@laxmikantbpandhare
Copy link
Member

Overall LGTM to enable k8s 1.26 support.

A general nit: I think we should investigate the deprecation notices from the lint check to see if there is an alternative we can change and do a little bit of future proofing for our next k8s bumps.

@rashmigottipati - deprecation errors, those functions completely removed or renamed in newer versions of k8s. We need to check and fix it before merging.

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Mar 5, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 6, 2023
rashmigottipati and others added 6 commits March 6, 2023 12:05
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 6, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4352492700

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.498%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3877933874: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1713
Relevant Lines: 1914

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@laxmikantbpandhare laxmikantbpandhare left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Looks good to me

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 6, 2023
@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member Author

@varshaprasad96 @everettraven could you please review this PR again?

@rashmigottipati
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks to @varshaprasad96 for helping fix the lint errors!!!

go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member Author

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold
until operator-framework/operator-lib#112 merges first

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 6, 2023
go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati changed the title bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.1 bump k8s dependencies to 1.26.2 Mar 7, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 7, 2023
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Gottipati <chowdary.grashmi@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From what I can tell all the changes look good. Thanks @rashmigottipati !

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati merged commit 6e30bde into operator-framework:main Mar 7, 2023
@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati deleted the k8sbump branch March 7, 2023 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps area/sdk area/testing lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants