-
Hi everyone! I had a brief Twitter exchange with @wooorm yesterday about improving the documentation for unified and the projects in the collective. The documents at https://unifiedjs.com/learn/ are a great improvement over the READMEs spread across the vast array of utils, plugins, etc that make up unified, but having a cohesive set of docs for the main site would be a great help to newcomers. In that spirit, I'd like to start a discussion about working on the documentation as a project unto itself and offer to help as much as my time allows. I'm a computer science student who works in local news full-time and would love to help contribute what I can to this vast ecosystem of tools. My limited understanding may help write introductory documentation that helps people who need a basic understanding of the tools. Let me know what you think! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
-
Welcome @nemo-omen! 👋
Improvements to the documentation and new guides are welcome!
Do you mean this in the broad context of contributing? Or do you have a more specific meaning to "project" in mind?
A fresh set of perspectives, views, and eyes to author and review guides are welcome! If you have some ideas in mind, would be happy to hear more and discuss! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think the main problem unified has, documentation wise, isn’t that stuff isn’t documented: everything is already documented somewhere. I think the main problem is that it’s hard to find. And an aspect of unified, is that I don’t see it every becoming easy to get into. unified is about 80 times the size of linux, focussing on complex topics (ASTs, compilers), and is very few people with very limited funding. I’m also somewhat conflicted about users who, for example, want to use unified for one single relatively simple use case such as adding a table of contents to their readme, to name something random. unified is capable of doing that, but that’s like buying a fancy 111 piece hand tool set but then only ever using the hammer. Perhaps those users can be converted to let unified handle more work, and I sometimes do create recipes such as HTML and remark and Tables in remark for them. That being said, there’s a lot that can be improved. I appreciate you wanting to help and thanks for creating this discussions.
I guess there are three ways:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
👀 -- getting caught up |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I think the main problem unified has, documentation wise, isn’t that stuff isn’t documented: everything is already documented somewhere. I think the main problem is that it’s hard to find.
And an aspect of unified, is that I don’t see it every becoming easy to get into. unified is about 80 times the size of linux, focussing on complex topics (ASTs, compilers), and is very few people with very limited funding.
I’m also somewhat conflicted about users who, for example, want to use unified for one single relatively simple use case such as adding a table of contents to their readme, to name something random. unified is capable of doing that, but that’s like buying a fancy 111 piece hand tool …