Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overhaul root system type detection #3351

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

lgoettgens
Copy link
Member

The function cartan_type_with_ordering errored and gave wrong results on some inputs. This PR completely rewrites the function and adds exhaustive tests.
Furthermore, all of the constructors of root system related types now take the same types of arguments.
And there are now more ways to print a Dynkin diagram. These were added here to be able to provide some visual tests for cartan_type_with_ordering.

Co-authored-by: Felix Röhrich <47457568+felix-roehrich@users.noreply.github.com>
@lgoettgens
Copy link
Member Author

lgoettgens commented Feb 14, 2024

Everything should be addressed now

Copy link
Collaborator

@felix-roehrich felix-roehrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Lgtm.

@lgoettgens lgoettgens added merge me backport 1.0.x Should be backported to the release 1.0 branch labels Feb 15, 2024
@benlorenz benlorenz mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2024
33 tasks
@thofma thofma merged commit df2fa2b into oscar-system:master Feb 16, 2024
20 checks passed
@lgoettgens lgoettgens deleted the lg/cartan-detection branch February 16, 2024 14:25
benlorenz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2024
@benlorenz benlorenz removed the backport 1.0.x Should be backported to the release 1.0 branch label Feb 19, 2024
benlorenz added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
### Backported PRs

- [x] #3367
- [x] #3379 
- [x] #3369
- [x] #3291
- [x] #3325
- [x] #3350 
- [x] #3351
- [x] #3365 
- [x] #3366
- [x] #3382
- [x] #3373
- [x] #3341
- [x] #3346
- [x] #3381
- [x] #3385
- [x] #3387 
- [x] #3398 
- [x] #3399 
- [x] #3374 
- [x] #3406 
- [x] #2823
- [x] #3298
- [x] #3386 
- [x] #3412 
- [x] #3392 
- [x] #3415 
- [x] #3394
- [x] #3391
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants