You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Only one specialized encoding method is required for "imperfect" radices, wheras one specialized encoding method per integer type is required for "perfect" radices because the "perfect" radix chunk sequence is a Slice<some NBKDoubleWidth>. I may reduce this to a single specialization by using the buffer pointer from withContiguousStorage(_:) instead. This approach also turns out to be about 10% faster. Win-win.
Note: with big-endian reverse() it is still faster than the current approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From oscbyspro/Numberick#31
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: