Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(ast/builder): use Box::new_in over .into_in #4428

Merged

Conversation

overlookmotel
Copy link
Contributor

@overlookmotel overlookmotel commented Jul 23, 2024

In AstBuilder's alloc_* methods, use Box::new_in instead of .into_in. This is more explicit, so I feel easier to understand. It may also make life easier for compiler by not requiring it to perform type coercion.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-ast Area - AST label Jul 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @overlookmotel and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@overlookmotel overlookmotel marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 15:11
@overlookmotel overlookmotel requested a review from rzvxa July 23, 2024 15:12
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jul 23, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #4428 will not alter performance

Comparing 07-23-refactor_ast_builder_use_box_new_in_over_.into_in_ (9c5d2f9) with main (46cf717)

Summary

✅ 32 untouched benchmarks

@overlookmotel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rzvxa you are master of the AST codegen. Do you agree with this change?

@overlookmotel overlookmotel added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Jul 24, 2024
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Merge activity

  • Jul 24, 12:33 PM EDT: The merge label 'merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Jul 24, 12:34 PM EDT: overlookmotel added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Jul 24, 12:37 PM EDT: overlookmotel merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.

In `AstBuilder`'s `alloc_*` methods, use `Box::new_in` instead of `.into_in`. This is more explicit, so I feel easier to understand. It may also make life easier for compiler by not requiring it to perform type coercion.
@overlookmotel overlookmotel force-pushed the 07-23-refactor_ast_builder_use_box_new_in_over_.into_in_ branch from 1a7d903 to 9c5d2f9 Compare July 24, 2024 16:34
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 9c5d2f9 into main Jul 24, 2024
23 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 07-23-refactor_ast_builder_use_box_new_in_over_.into_in_ branch July 24, 2024 16:37
@oxc-bot oxc-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2024
Dunqing pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2024
## [0.22.1] - 2024-07-27

### Features

- 2477330 ast: Add `AstKind::TSExportAssignment` (#4501) (Dunqing)
- aaee07e ast: Add `AstKind::AssignmentTargetPattern`,
`AstKind::ArrayAssignmentTarget` and `AstKind::ObjectAssignmentTarget`
(#4456) (Dunqing)
- fd363d1 ast: Add AstKind::get_container_scope_id (#4450) (DonIsaac)
- e2735ca span: Add `contains_inclusive` method (#4491) (DonIsaac)

### Bug Fixes

- 368112c ast: Remove `#[visit(ignore)]` from
`ExportDefaultDeclarationKind`'s `TSInterfaceDeclaration` (#4497)
(Dunqing)
- 36bb680 semantic: `TSExportAssignment` cannot reference type binding
(#4502) (Dunqing)
- cb2fa49 semantic: `typeof` operator cannot reference type-only import
(#4500) (Dunqing)
- ef0e953 semantic: Generic passed to typeof not counted as a reference
(#4499) (Dunqing)
- 40cafb8 semantic: Params in `export default (function() {})` flagged
as `SymbolFlags::Export` (#4480) (Dunqing)
- 2e01a45 semantic: Non-exported namespace member symbols flagged as
exported (#4493) (Don Isaac)
- e4ca06a semantic: Incorrect symbol’s scope_id after var hoisting
(#4458) (Dunqing)
- 77bd5f1 semantic: Use correct span for namespace symbols (#4448) (Don
Isaac)
- 5db7bed sourcemap: Fix pre-calculation of required segments for
building JSON (#4490) (overlookmotel)
- 1667491 syntax: Correct `is_reserved_keyword_or_global_object`'s
incorrect function calling. (#4484) (Ethan Goh)
- 82ba2a0 syntax: Fix unsound use of `NonZeroU32` (#4466)
(overlookmotel)
- c04b9aa transformer: Add to `SymbolTable::declarations` for all
symbols (#4460) (overlookmotel)
- ecdee88 transformer/typescript: Incorrect eliminate exports when the
referenced symbol is both value and type (#4507) (Dunqing)

### Performance

- 963a2d1 mangler: Reduce unnecessary allocation (#4498) (Dunqing)
- 868fc87 parser: Optimize conditional advance on ASCII values (#4298)
(lucab)
- 24beaeb semantic: Give `AstNodeId` a niche (#4469) (overlookmotel)
- 348c1ad semantic: Remove `span` field from `Reference` (#4464)
(overlookmotel)
- 6a9f4db semantic: Reduce storage size for symbol redeclarations
(#4463) (overlookmotel)
- 705e19f sourcemap: Reduce memory copies encoding JSON (#4489)
(overlookmotel)
- 4d10c6c sourcemap: Pre allocate String buf while encoding (#4476)
(Brooooooklyn)

### Documentation

- f5f0ba8 ast: Add doc comments to more AST nodes (#4413) (Don Isaac)
- 871b3d6 semantic: Add doc comments for SymbolTester and SemanticTester
(#4433) (DonIsaac)

### Refactor

- 9c5d2f9 ast/builder: Use `Box::new_in` over `.into_in` (#4428)
(overlookmotel)
- ccb1835 semantic: Methods take `Span` as param, not `&Span` (#4470)
(overlookmotel)
- f17254a semantic: Populate `declarations` field in
`SymbolTable::create_symbol` (#4461) (overlookmotel)
- a49f491 semantic: Re-order `SymbolTable` fields (#4459)
(overlookmotel)
- 7cd53f3 semantic: Var hoisting (#4379) (Dunqing)
- 4f5a7cb semantic: Mark SemanticTester and SymbolTester as must_use
(#4430) (DonIsaac)
- c958a55 sourcemap: `push_list` method for building JSON (#4486)
(overlookmotel)
- c99b3eb syntax: Give `ScopeId` a niche (#4468) (overlookmotel)
- 96fc94f syntax: Use `NonMaxU32` for IDs (#4467) (overlookmotel)

### Testing

- 4b274a8 semantic: Add more test cases for symbol references (#4429)
(DonIsaac)

Co-authored-by: Boshen <1430279+Boshen@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue A-ast Area - AST
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants