Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a @static version/OS check on the #235 workaround #260

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pablosanjose
Copy link
Owner

Since the workaround to #235 is only required in 1.10 under linux, and since it incurs a non-negligible overhead when computing a single spectrum call, we statically apply the workaround from #234 only in the required cases.

Closes #235

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.43%. Comparing base (a26d181) to head (1a1e2c8).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #260      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.48%   92.43%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        5885     5880       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         5443     5435       -8     
- Misses        442      445       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pablosanjose pablosanjose merged commit 716aae0 into master Apr 4, 2024
9 checks passed
@pablosanjose pablosanjose deleted the issue235 branch April 4, 2024 21:14
@pablosanjose pablosanjose mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Segfault (use-after-free?) due to interaction between FunctionWrappers and Julia 1.10
2 participants