Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade rack from 3.1.4 to 3.1.5 #311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

mefellows
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • example/zoo-app/Gemfile
⚠️ Warning ``` Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging. ```

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-RUBY-RACK-7416898
  631  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

@YOU54F YOU54F merged commit 27d1b31 into master Aug 6, 2024
62 checks passed
@YOU54F YOU54F deleted the snyk-fix-5c6eb595ca4835573073f1352da30bd0 branch August 7, 2024 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants