-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DEPR: add shims for util + TST: test that we work in downstream packages #16250
Conversation
should update to have at least an example for each one. |
d6fe725
to
4ecf5b1
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #16250 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.33% 90.33% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 164 164
Lines 50890 50890
==========================================
+ Hits 45972 45973 +1
+ Misses 4918 4917 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #16250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.33% 90.3% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3
Lines 50890 50907 +17
==========================================
Hits 45972 45972
- Misses 4918 4935 +17
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
8b8969e
to
68a52b4
Compare
dc0cdcb
to
92d1873
Compare
pandas/util/decorators.py
Outdated
"from pandas.util", | ||
DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=3) | ||
|
||
from pandas.util import cache_readonly # noqa |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know of anybody using it, but maybe also Appender and Substition to be sure? (or import *)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
Nice to add such test
@jreback I'm taking care of the release note for this in my doc updates (will have a PR shortly). |
thanks @TomAugspurger yeah will merge when this is fixed. |
- Moved whatsnew for 0.20.1 -> 0.20.2 (unreleased) - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.0 -> 0.20.1 (releasing soon) - Added release note for pandas-dev#16250
- Moved whatsnew for 0.20.1 -> 0.20.2 (unreleased) - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.0 -> 0.20.1 (releasing soon) - Added release note for pandas-dev#16250
- Moved whatsnew for 0.20.1 -> 0.20.2 (unreleased) - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.0 -> 0.20.1 (releasing soon) - Added release note for pandas-dev#16250
@jreback https://travis-ci.org/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/229097977 failed. Does that error message make sense to you? |
@TomAugspurger still working on things. |
turns out our build-test build was not actually testing the correct installation :< |
* DOC: Updated release notes for 0.20.1 - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.1 -> 0.20.2 (unreleased) - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.0 -> 0.20.1 (releasing soon) - Added release note for #16250 * DOC: Move 0.20.1 to a note * DOC: Simplify excel style example
lon it built correctly but still some issue |
This all passed. Good to merge then? |
The build one failed https://travis-ci.org/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/229133755 |
not yet |
Ah, yes, I didn't look at the allowed failures... |
But, it is only the setting up of the test build env, not the actual code changes? Those could already be merged? |
Ah, yes I think so. Although, those tests will be skipped if the deps aren't around. Do we we have dask and geopandas anywhere else in the matrix? |
we can test those two locally |
I checked out this PR, and can confirm it fixed the geopandas import for me |
I think we're good then. I'll ensure they work after tagging but before
uploading.
…On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Joris Van den Bossche < ***@***.***> wrote:
I checked out this PR, and can confirm it fixed the geopandas import for me
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16250 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQHIiIeA89ll0o3pVss0hh10UU14noHks5r20qWgaJpZM4NRuiT>
.
|
@jreback OK to merge and fix the test later? |
yes that is fine |
* DOC: Updated release notes for 0.20.1 - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.1 -> 0.20.2 (unreleased) - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.0 -> 0.20.1 (releasing soon) - Added release note for pandas-dev#16250 * DOC: Move 0.20.1 to a note * DOC: Simplify excel style example
* DOC: Updated release notes for 0.20.1 - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.1 -> 0.20.2 (unreleased) - Moved whatsnew for 0.20.0 -> 0.20.1 (releasing soon) - Added release note for pandas-dev#16250 * DOC: Move 0.20.1 to a note * DOC: Simplify excel style example
Version 0.20.1 * tag 'v0.20.1': RLS: v0.20.1 DOC: update release notes (pandas-dev#16259) DEPR: add shims for util + TST: test that we work in downstream packages (pandas-dev#16250) DOC: some reviewing of the 0.20 whatsnew file (pandas-dev#16254) DOC: add read_gbq as top-level in api.rst (pandas-dev#16256) DOC: Updated release notes for 0.20.1 (pandas-dev#16251)
Removes the following: * pandas.types * pandas.computation * pandas.util.decorators xref pandas-devgh-16157. xref pandas-devgh-16250.
Removes the following: * pandas.types * pandas.computation * pandas.util.decorators xref pandas-devgh-16157. xref pandas-devgh-16250.
Removes the following: * pandas.types * pandas.computation * pandas.util.decorators xref pandas-devgh-16157. xref pandas-devgh-16250.
Removes the following: * pandas.types * pandas.computation * pandas.util.decorators xref pandas-devgh-16157. xref pandas-devgh-16250.
Removes the following: * pandas.types * pandas.computation * pandas.util.decorators xref pandas-devgh-16157. xref pandas-devgh-16250.
No description provided.