BUG: writing invalid table names to sqlite

[huguesv]

I verified that the test exposes the bug prior to the fix for bug #13206.

Pandas from master

>>> import sqlite3
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> import numpy as np
>>> conn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:')
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [0, 1, 2], 'B': [0.2, np.nan, 5.6]})
>>> df.to_sql('d1187b08-4943-4c8d-a7f6-6c06b7cb9509', conn, index=False)
>>> 

Pandas 0.13.1

>>> import sqlite3
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> import numpy as np
>>> conn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:')
>>> df = pd.DataFrame({'A': [0, 1, 2], 'B': [0.2, np.nan, 5.6]})
>>> df.to_sql('d1187b08-4943-4c8d-a7f6-6c06b7cb9509', conn, index=False)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "C:\Projects\Sprints\PandasVirtualEnvLatest\PandasVirtualEnvLatest\oldpy27\lib\site-packages\pandas\core\frame.py", line 1261, in to_sql
    self, name, con, flavor=flavor, if_exists=if_exists, **kwargs)
  File "C:\Projects\Sprints\PandasVirtualEnvLatest\PandasVirtualEnvLatest\oldpy27\lib\site-packages\pandas\io\sql.py", line 226, in write_frame
    cur.execute(create)
OperationalError: near "-": syntax error
>>> 

[jreback]

can you read this back and compare

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #16464 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #16464   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.42%   90.42%           
=======================================
  Files         161      161           
  Lines       51027    51027           
=======================================
  Hits        46142    46142           
  Misses       4885     4885

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	88.26% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	40.17% <ø> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 04356a8...bc3a99d. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #16464 into master will increase coverage by 0.37%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #16464      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.42%   90.79%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       51027    51063      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits        46142    46365     +223     
+ Misses       4885     4698     -187

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	88.63% <ø> (+0.37%)	⬆️
#single	40.15% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/io/feather_format.py	85.71% <0%> (-2.17%)	⬇️
pandas/plotting/_converter.py	63.23% <0%> (-1.82%)	⬇️
pandas/core/categorical.py	95.5% <0%> (-0.42%)	⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py	97.66% <0%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
pandas/core/reshape/pivot.py	95.08% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
pandas/core/resample.py	96.09% <0%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
pandas/core/ops.py	91.69% <0%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
pandas/plotting/_core.py	81.92% <0%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
pandas/core/generic.py	92.26% <0%> (+0.13%)	⬆️
pandas/core/series.py	94.9% <0%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
... and 7 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 04356a8...bc3a99d. Read the comment docs.

[huguesv]

@jreback I've added the additional verification, and all checks are now passing.

[TomAugspurger]

Thanks!